Posted in Shoes on heads on Jun 21st, 2009 6 Comments »
A strange marriage that ChatToText asks us to make. As groom, our shoe: elevated, dignified, eleemosynary; as bride, an advertisement: vulgar, proselytising, sterile. And yet who are we to judge their accommodation of each other? If a bird and a fish fall in love, where else but here, in our catholic embrace, might they find [...]
Posted in Shoes on heads on Jun 19th, 2009 1 Comment »
Not content to achieve only the supremely difficult one-armeded pint-drain SoH, this venerable exponent complicates his act of expression further by introducing such features as might be considered worthy accomplishments in and of themselves. Including the more obvious “Mephistophelian Eye” and “80s Hasbro Nostalgia Signification”, but shaded by such subtle embellishment as “Background Goofy Drunk [...]
Posted in Shoes on heads on Jun 18th, 2009 1 Comment »
It’s all too easy to lose sight of the joy and incredulity that should fundamentally inform our engagement. Be inspired then, by the sight of this older gentleman’s grinning and winsome visage as he, in his advanced age and moribund state of physical decay, becomes conscious of the wonderland of potentiality that lies before him, [...]
Posted in Shoes on heads on Jun 17th, 2009 3 Comments »
For the record. Shoesonheads.com does not approve of non-consensual acts of apical shoe establishment. Let this image serve as grim testimony to the consequences of the gross indignities enacted by those who, in their zealous passion for proselytism, fall themselves afoul of our communal standard of decorum and propriety.
Posted in Shoes on heads on Jun 15th, 2009 6 Comments »
(Best viewed on Youtube.) The road to shoewin is fraught with peril and traps for the unwary. Here it appeared to be the case that when I said “put the shoe on your head”, she thought I meant “stick your hand in the shoe and pretend it’s a toy boat”. An easy mistake to make, [...]
Posted in Shoes on heads on Jun 15th, 2009 2 Comments »
(Best viewed on Youtube.) Witness to carnal degradation and vulgar spectacle yet not sullied by affective participation in same, here Morticia sounds a clarion call for SoH repudiation on the grounds that the belfry should never be substract to the mezzanine, betraying immediately her delusional state of vile and plebian category. Gentlemen, we are not [...]